Just another redditfugee. Maybe I’ll infodump a little more about me later… depends on how things develop here.

  • 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • No problem, it’s nice to have a level-headed exchange amidst an ongoing tornado of sewage :)

    So, I can try to empathize with either side (mods and users) for each of the two quotes, and there might be scenarios where one is completely right and one is wrong. But as an outsider to the kind of debates where these quotes are commonly used, I simply don’t have the cultural understanding to help much with answering your question. Sorry.

    Drawing the arch back to my initial statement: There are several levels of escalation present between utilising famous people quotes to make a general point and trying to dodge around community rules by veiling direct threats to a specified (inferred from context) group. I am of the opinion that the guillotine-comment I replied to is definitely stepping over the line and only remains standing, because right now additional enforcement of rules is (probably) not going to improve the weather situation mentioned above.


  • I had to look up what that even is, because I haven’t encountered that one before. (me not being US-American)

    I cannot make a call on a reference to a quote brought forth on an unspecified subject without context.

    In regards to JFK - yes that would count as advocating violence in a very generalised sense. But without context, again, I am not able to make a call, whether a ban on someone making the quote is justified or not. In general, moderation policy also falls under freedom of expression. Consequently, freedom of speech is not a claimable right against non-governmental agents. It’s a thing that a lot of people seem to selectively overlook when advocating for what would actually be better described as “Anarchy of speech”.