![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Your membership to the service is now worse off comparatively, so the benefits you receive have shrunk. Shrinkflation feels pretty apt here
Your membership to the service is now worse off comparatively, so the benefits you receive have shrunk. Shrinkflation feels pretty apt here
Good, glad this shithouse comment is getting the proper downvotes
Love these low quality ones. Gives a nice homely vibe
Important to contain all your mess to one side of the room, makes it easier to manage
As it should be, there’s way too much reengineering of the wheel. Let the big brains of the past do the heavy lifting
People generally will fairly buy content when it’s available and fairly priced if they want to support the creators. There’s a huge difference between wanting to help your favorite content producer VS companies that fart out mult-hundred dollar box sets of old content
I’ve found CS6 has almost every feature you’d want and it’s well over a decade old now. Much better in my mind than paying monthly for new features you won’t probably use
The system is based on the bleeding edge of the PHP stack, using PHP 8.3x and Symfony 6 as the framework. There’s plenty of devs out there, especially symfony ones. The main issues I’ve found is pulling in people who are interested in the ActivityPub side of the project.
I think a few more months and most of the user-facing UI/UX issues will be improved. The moderation side, along with quality of life admin tools are definitely lacking though.
There’s been a heap of development going on with kbin recently, with a release upcoming. Overall the development process has been a bit slow with Ernest (the guy who owns the project) having personal issues to resolve.
Definitely the moderation process needs to be improved so that we have better ways of addressing spam so it doesn’t bother other instances.
Personally I’m of the opinion that we should be using a metric based system where we weigh in the users date or creation, overall interactivity, upvote / downvote ratio and other data to potentially flag spam users. But honestly fighting spam is really hard and all of that would have to be built (plus it’s a public repo so bad actors could look for how this is pieced together and find new ways to get past)
Rather picky for a bin!
Probably rubbish scraped from other legitimate sites. These websites are just the worst
Would have expected the asset hosting to be higher, given the number of images (both the original + the resized thumbnails etc)
Cheers for the numbers, always good to see transparency for income and expenses
Yeah but have you seen some people’s documentation? I get it’s not a glamorous task but I’ve seen some stinkers before (a heap of properties and methods just thrown on a page with barely any description and no reasonable samples)
This seems like the better approach. Let other sites who theoretically have image detection in place sort this out. We can just link to images hosted elsewhere
Better to semi restrict sign ups so the experience is improved for everyone. When those security issues have been fixed we can open up again. Seems fair
Probably had shit parents who never taught them about basic respect and decency when they were growing up (which they’ll now pass on to the next generation of dropkicks they squeeze out)
Spot on. You don’t see this at the targets I’ve been to thankfully
Finally, was wondering where exactly these things would have been used 😮