Why not donate everything to charities you support instead?

colleges (FTFY)

Second sentence in the article: “Under the proposal, banks could continue to charge fees when a customer’s account falls below zero…” – that’s what it is. Back in the day, if you wrote a check for more than you have in your account, the bank would not only bounce the check (refuse to pay so the check holder wouldn’t get your money at all), they’d charge a fee on top of that so your balance would go even lower (sometimes below zero).

Third paragraph: “In a short media gaggle with reporters after publication, McCarthy said he planned to run for reelection, had not considered resigning and he will stick around: ‘I’m still here finishing my job.’”

So which is it?

Her legacy was wearing thin long before that.

The “Silent Majority” is neither.

All of this. It’s also annoying as hell that the next presidential election is 14 months out and the campaigning (i.e. fundraising) has already been underway for some time. If we put half as much effort into solving problems as we do pointing them out and picking the next person to (not) solve them, we’d all be a lot better off.

Term limits just ensure the incumbent doesn’t care about their last term. If they do a good job and the incoming candidates look lousy, they should be allowed to continue. Want to really make a difference? Get money out of politics. Big corporate donations and mega media are what drives the campaigns, including who gets on the ballot in the first place, not the voters.

Show me a judge who hasn’t pre-judged a case. It’s how a good number of judges get appointed (looks at SCOTUS re abortion) or how some don’t even get a hearing (looks at Mitch McConnell re Merrick Garland).

There’s an easy solution for that.

Broadcast and cable are distinct entities, but this particular affiliate is owned and operated by Fox.

False. Even the SCOTUS website says this. “The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship. A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law.”

Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution says Supreme Court Justices “shall hold their offices during good behaviour”. If Congress can define “militia” for the purposes of the Second Amendment, they can define “good behaviour” for this.