I didn’t really care about this thread until I read this comment.

Of course they have milk! With vodka and some Kalua/Bailey’s!

Show me potato salad!

Your dad is right. On desktop, navigation is on the left. On tablet, you shrink it to a rail. On mobile it should be a dismissible nav drawer.

The top menus, especially the flyover(on mouse hover), are bad for accessibility because they convert a non-committal action (hover) to a context changing one (focus). It’s a uniquely web-only invention and thankfully falling out of usage. (Unless you mean menubar/toolbar. Those are fine but extremely rare on Web.)

I don’t code much C++, but then I’d lose alignment with: x = *p; and I feel that would bug me.

I’m looking at Google Style Guide for my next project and it says either is fine, just don’t declare more than one per line.

You don’t need Typescript, you need an linter (eslint).

=== is your basic equality like most languages. == will implicitly cast type.

The breakdown is here: https://262.ecma-international.org/5.1/#sec-11.9.3

Modern JS says to never use == unless you’re comparing against null or undefined.

I don’t know why you’re bringing up Palisade. The OP clearly says Telluride and the text mentions Kia. I have the same car, 2020.

You either have remote start over Kia Connect or key fob. It’s either, not both.

And a Reddit comment goes further:

No 2020 Tellurides in North America had remote start on the key fob from the factory.

https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaTelluride/comments/14737v9/telluride_remote_start/

See also: https://www.kiatelluride.org/threads/2020-telluride-remote-start.1825/ (outside of US has fob)

You can’t remote start with the key (at least on the 2020). It’s remote cellular start that runs on a ~40 second interval or nothing (or third party).

I have a Telluride. I’ve been downgraded to Lite which gives you notifications if you forget to lock your car. But remote start is no longer available.

The way it worked seems to be polling since you could wait around up to a minute for the car to perform a command.

The worst part is the car does not have “local” remote start. I’d have to buy another piece of equipment for that and install it. It’s not available at all on the key fob.

I said that?

The problem is it’s a script that logs onto Haier’s servers with the user’s email and password and starts polling for data. Considering that most designed usage is probably based around users every once in a while checking and adjusting their thermostat, just one user with an HACS install doing a poll every minute is 1440x more usage than the next who checks it once a day. If HACS uses were the majority of traffic for these devices I wouldn’t be surprised by that metric.

That’s what probably meant by the ToS because the users using it are probably violating it, and the addon can be considered as something that makes violating it easier (it doesn’t have a secondary purpose other than using a set of credentials that are only given after accepting the ToS).

I’ve had crappy “Smart” ACs and Samsung was the absolute worst. At random times their AWS instance in Europe would go down or their app wouldn’t respond. I gave up and coded my own script to directly interface with the device over the local WiFi. You cut Samsung completely out of the equation. You don’t have to worry about their servers not working anymore. That’s an ideal way for an add-on to work. Ideally most of the script can be retuned to work directly with the device.

Different locations can have different CPC (cost-per-click) bid configured. Even if you have multiple locations of a business, it’s still managed per site. Different areas also have different CPC rates depending on who is around that location (not including your own businesses). For example, a metropolitan CPC rate is higher than a rural one because so many others compete with you.

That 25 minute one is near a bunch of other stores and I’d bet has a higher CPC rate. The 2 minute one is more isolated.

I checked and that all have about the same rating (3.5), so it shouldn’t have been ranked by that. In the end, Google isn’t picking what’s best for the consumer, and enough to encourage me to go 20 minutes extra out of my way. Them being all the same franchise helps clarify it isn’t an issue of finding a better search term match since they’re all identically labeled the same.

Same for me literally today. I know what was closest, but didn’t want to deal with the “recalculating route”, so I decided to ask Google to pick the nearest McDonald’s as an extra stop:

• 19 minutes detour
• 4 minutes detour
• 25 minutes detour
• 2 minutes detour

At this point, I’m convinced Google only cares about presenting what’s most profitable to them regardless of any sort of convenience to the consumer.

It’s too far gone for it to be even usable.

SORT BY BOTTOM_LINE vs SORT BY BEST

Should be a hyphen instead of period before NAHOM.

I just recently worked on fixed point 8.8 and basically the way fractional values work, you take an integer and say that integer is then divided by another one. So you represent the number in question with two numbers not one. 0.3 can be presented in a number of ways, like 30 % 10, or 6 % 20.

The problem is the way 0.1 is represented and 0.2 represented don’t jive when you add them, so the compiler makes a fractional representation of 0.3 based on how 0.1 and 0.2 were expressed that just comes out weird.

That’s also why 0.3 + 0.3 is fine. When you wrote 0.3, the compiler/runtime already knew how to express 0.3 without rounding errors.

You can use Dev Tools to see a page’s full accessibility tree:

Chrome: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/full-accessibility-tree/#full-accessibility-tree-in-devtools

Firefox: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools-user/accessibility_inspector/#features-of-the-accessibility-panel

I haven’t really looked for anything that will present that to you as an Add-On/Extension but it’s theoretically possible.

We’re kinda getting it back with the Accessibility tree

In theory, if the page is compiled right, you can read everything right from there. You could also interact with it.

I’ve been writing my own render framework and component library for about a year now.

One thing I enjoy most about it is that the types are automatically inferred. There’s a lot of Typescript wrangling going on, and it gets really deep into what TS is capable of and barely capable of (polymorphic this, dynamic return types based on input, Class type reconstruction, mixins that influence both static and instance properties, event listeners based on event name, typed property watchers based on property name).

It’s all written in JavaScript with “JSDocs”. It’s not really JSDocs because there’s a lot of recursion that’s not possible with regular JSDocs. It’s TS type information slipped into JSDoc comments.

Ridiculously complex core Class

But that is to setup the ability to tap into inferred types. The actual code that’s written (eg: components) is fully typed check with little or no type declaration.

Declarative-style component with almost no explicit typing

The reality is, no complex piece of code should be written without some form of type checking. TS isn’t perfect and if there were something better, I’d move. Alliances are stupid. There are problems with some things that have not been, and likely will never be, fixed. But what type-checkers should do best is infer types dynamically.

The result means all my code today just runs in the browser. I don’t have to wrangle builders or compilers (bye Webpack!). At most, I use just esbuild to minify, though it’s an optional step, not a mandatory one. If I want to mess around on Codepen with my library, I can refer to a git commit directly and load the file. I don’t need npm to package and release. (CodePen Sample)

As a PocketPC (WinMo) user before the iPhone even existed, I take offense to the claim.

They pioneered capacitive touchscreen for ease of use, but I had ditched dumb phones years before iPhone.

Note XDA refers to the old Windows Mobile XDA phone and then became an Android community. I was there for that transition and none of us were very impressed with the iPhone, but understood that it would be something for the tech illiterate would eat up.

When Android came out, we went from Custom Roms for WinMo to Custom ROMs for Android.

Yes in Windows Server since, IIRC, 2012". No in Windows client versions.

I’m so used to Server commands I sometimes am surprised when commands like logoff don’t work.