Well, in the context of the Steam Deck, DRM works fine and anti-cheats often don’t.
Well, in the context of the Steam Deck, DRM works fine and anti-cheats often don’t.
No, and it runs denuvo games fine. It’s things like EAC or EA Anti-Cheat that break on Deck/Linux.
I stopped getting those once I got rid of my +1 number. For some reason even after 6 years my +31 doesn’t get them.
*per open file
Maybe your browser is blocking tracking or other cookies that adblockers also target.
Yes, and? That reinforces what I’m saying. As long as they don’t install the cookies, the user can browse the site without seeing the banner. Therefore if the user blocks the banner, they can’t install the cookies, that doesn’t mean they can’t show the user the site.
Not sure what’s hard to understand here.
No, it doesn’t. The banner is only needed for you to accept the cookies. It’s completely fine to just block the banners or not show them, just the user can’t accept the cookies, so CNN can’t use them.
CNN would rather block the user than lose out on the chance to save those cookies.
Would bet €20 this is the Netherlands
I think the feature sets are similar and both seem secure, but I went with Bitwarden because I prefer supporting open source.
Because Stardust said “Get a Steam Deck and then you’ll see why” which makes no sense in the context of Denuvo DRM, hence it is most likely Stardust confusing anti cheat issues for DRM ones. Not that hard to figure out.