The ones I am talking about don’t move under their own weight and gravity. If you held it with the cap upwards, it doesn’t rotate downwards unless you do it yourself

hence why getting hit in the face and struggling with a little cap is so puzzling to me

less knife friendly

Most places are advanced enough to not require their citizens to carry weaponry.

needing to always be armed is a uniquely american problem

Does america have terrible bottle designs or something? Not one single bottle with tethered cap has ever freely spun, you can move it and it stays in that position

what i think when people struggle with the cap hitting their face

Having trouble?

Not supporting this marketing, because its bullshit. but

They could double the chocolate but also double the cookie dough

Thus technically you’re getting double, and its still 40% of the cookie.

Its just you also get double the dough.

a tip i saw elsewhere, put “before:2023” in your search query

When OP visited huggingface, they felt very out of place- like a cave man being guided through dexters lab.

I got you OP - my blocklist is now 100s of communities. But I much rather browse all and discover new things, rather than sub to a couple specific communities and never discover anything new.

I wouldn’t call it mildly infuriating though. Its just how I choose to browse

doesnt have print nor allow variable declaration without keywords

Same thoughts I had.

1. Language which allows variable declaration as name = value without any keywords or its a variable declared outside of the example
2. Has lowercase .length and not .len or other
3. .length is also a property and not a method? Assuming convention .length() for method call like print(x)

does it give reference to what language this is in?

x = string length of “Monday” => 6

passed my gcse?

Should be Cancel or Cancel Cancel

/s

Correct terminology makes your eyes hurt?

Thanks, brexit. yet another win 🙄

Not to suggest it isn’t a problem that needs to be solved. But from my understanding of activitypub protocol, there isn’t a way to control content federation on a per message basis, solely on allow/block instances as a whole

But when anyone can run an instance, you can’t control it. Someone has an instance which allows them to make as many posts as they want, and then all that content is federated to connect servers

“Reduce your security to fix the issue”

Wonderful.

Have you tried giving them your email address?

I personally found IRC to be the best solution for ebooks. Not sure how much detail/links are allowed here but theres plenty of guides. Look for “IRCHighway ebooks” on your preferred search engine